All projects

SHIPPED · 2024

BEST BUY CONNECT · LEADERSHIP TOOLS

Designing a coaching dashboard for Best Buy store leaders

I designed a dashboard that showed who was receiving coaching, where gaps remained, and which leaders needed to act next.

Context

Best Buy Connect · internal employee platform

My role

I defined the dashboard hierarchy, employee and coach drill-downs, and privacy behavior with product, engineering, design, and retail operations.

ROLE • SENIOR UX DESIGNER

SCOPE • DASHBOARD + DRILL-DOWN

SHIPPED • OUTCOME DATA

Coaching dashboard screen: Insights tab for Store #1281 with draft feedback, participating coaches, and Feedback Given and Recognition Given ringsCoach activity detail screen listing Carter Evans's coaching and recognition activity over the last 7 days

Shipped · January 2024

The store-level view showed leaders which employees had been missed.

Best Buy Connect · iOS and Android

58
employees in the store
32
reached with feedback
12
active coaches

Before: open 58 profiles one at a time. After: one coverage view.

BEFORE · THE MANUAL PATH

58

employees, coverage unknown

Grid of 58 gray squares, one per employee, with no coverage information

A leader opened profiles one at a time or rebuilt the numbers in a spreadsheet outside the product. Nothing showed the store pattern.

AFTER · ONE COVERAGE VIEW

32 of 58

employees reached, and exactly who was not

Coverage view: Feedback Given 32 of 58 and Recognition Given 22 of 58 rings

One screen answered who had been reached. Every number opened the people behind it.

The project in one minute

The coaching tool supported feedback and recognition one employee at a time, but leaders could not see the pattern across a store.

I designed a store-level Insights experience that separated employee coverage from coach participation, then connected each signal to the right people and follow-up work.

ROLE
Senior UX Designer · information model, drill-downs, interaction, privacy behavior
TIMELINE
Designed 2023 · live January 2024
USERS
Store leaders and multi-unit leaders
TEAM
Product, engineering, design, and retail operations

Internal reporting showed higher coaching and recognition activity from Q3 to Q4

Q3 to Q4 · internal comparison

70%

more employees receiving recognition

51%

more coaching interactions

34%

more leaders providing recognition

Operating scale · later snapshot

82,469

Monthly coaching interactions in a later operating snapshot.

How to read this

Internal Q3-to-Q4 comparison. The reporting year and baseline counts are not shown. The later 82,469 figure is operating volume, not additional lift.

THE DECISIONS THAT SHAPED THE PRODUCT

Three decisions turned reporting into leadership action

PROBLEM

One profile could not reveal the store pattern.

Leaders had to open employees one at a time or build their own reporting outside the product.

INFORMATION MODEL

Coverage came before volume.

The overview measured which employees had been reached. Activity detail stayed one level down.

ACTION

Employee coverage and coach activity took separate paths.

Coverage stayed about employees. The participating-coaches signal opened the coach list and individual activity.

What a leader reads in the first five seconds

ANNOTATED · COACHING DASHBOARD

Annotated coaching dashboard screen with four numbered markers on draft feedback, participating coaches, coverage rings, and the percentage toggle

Unfinished work outranks the summary

Drafts expire. They sit above the metrics so fewer half-written notes are lost.

Coaches are people, not a count

Twelve is a link, not a statistic. It opens the list of who is doing the coaching.

Reach is the headline metric

The headline ring is who has been reached (32 of 58), not how many conversations happened. Volume sits one level down.

Counts by default, percentages on request

Counts keep the focus on people; percentages remain available as a secondary view.

The information model separates reach from activity

THE RANKING AND WHERE IT LANDS

Primary · answered on open

Coverage

Who has received coaching?

Employees reached · still uncoached · gaps by team

then, one level down

Secondary · answered on drill-down

Frequency

How often is coaching happening?

Conversations per employee · cadence · follow-up

IN THE INTERFACE

Overview fragment: Feedback Given 32/58 and Recognition Given 22/58 rings

Overview: the ring

Coverage is the first number on the screen.

Detail fragment: Carter Evans, activity in the last 30 days, 9 coaching and 4 recognition

Detail: the counts

Frequency only appears once you open a person.

Two signals, two distinct routes

Employee route

Coverage stays about employees

Coverage rings showing employees reached with feedback and recognition

The rings summarize which employees were reached. They do not represent coach activity.

Coach route

Participation leads to individual activity

Coach list

Participating coaches list ranked least to most active

The participating-coaches count opens a ranked coach list.

Coach activity

Coach activity detail showing what each coach did

Selecting a coach reveals activity and a path to follow up.

The access boundary is stated in the interface, not buried in a policy

Coach activity detail screen showing activity entries, the Carter Evans summary card, and a privacy note reading Activity only, conversation details stay private

PROTECTED · EXCLUDED FROM THIS VIEW

Conversation notes

Sensitive coaching detail

Anything the employee said in confidence

The leader view was designed not to request this content. The privacy rule is stated in the interface and documented for implementation.

Actionable

The boundary removes the content, not the next step. A leader still has a clear path to follow up.

REFLECTION

A dashboard is useful only when it changes the next decision.

The strongest move was defining the smallest set of signals that supported real leadership action, then connecting each signal to the people and work behind it.